Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think we're back to the question of what we hope to accomplish, which
> might be to have some contact for each RFC (or each standards-track
> RFC, or something. Mumbles) that could direct traffic on where to go
> next.
> I think the IESG (as a whole or as individual ADs, if you're good at
> guessing which one) is the last resort now, for people who want to
> follow up about an RFC and who can figure that out.
I don't think that random non-IETF RFC reader would know to contact the IESG!
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
