Re: [Last-Call] [Manycouches] Last Call: <draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting-04.txt> (Considerations for Cancellation of IETF Meetings) to Best Current Practice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Peter,

1. I agree that in the current environment it is unrealistic. However, this document is a long-term statement of principles. If there are no such alternatives, then it's a no-op for the LLC.

2. Thanks for the suggestion; you change is committed here:
https://github.com/martinduke/draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting

Martin

On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 7:00 AM Lars Eggert <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Forwarding these comments from Peter (with permission):

Begin forwarded message:
Two comments: 
1. Page 5 - 4.1 The relocation suggestion is in my view totally unrealistic. Finding a venue that meets the requirements is a process that takes months and is started years in advance. 
2. Smaller comment: refunding upon cancellation might be rephrased to:
Upon cancellation of the meeting, the LLC SHOULD offer refunds to all attendees. Attendees can opt-out of receiving a refund. ...
[ratio: if we will have to cancel close to a meeting, non-refundable costs will have been made and people could help the IETF by waiving their refund]

Thanks,
Lars

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux