John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> But that suggests that, at least for standards-track documents,
> having people ask questions directly of the authors and expect
> authoritative responses is something we should be discouraging,
> not encouraging.
I think such things should go into a bugtracker/ticket system, with the
authors and WG notified. I'd move all errata into such a system.
I think our current rfc-editor errata interface is too bespoke and simple.
The system I'd want is an instance of stackoverflow/serverfault/askubuntu/etc.
It just needs IESG members to be blessed with a really high reputation during
their tenure.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
