Fred,
I think that is already in the proposal -- see the last bullet
point ("* existing individual email addresses under ietf.org...")
Lars and Jason,
Seems completely sensible to me and is fairly similar to what I
would have proposed if asked (probably just a happy
coincidence). One tiny suggestion and a question:
* At least for the benefit of those of us with fat fingers, have
you considered a subdomain shorter than "staff". "llc.ietf.org"
or even "co.ietf.org" or "ad.ietf.org" would seem to have small
advantages if done at the beginning?
* Several people who are not employees of the LLC, particularly
Secretariat Staff working for AMS, already have ietf.org role
accounts. As I understand the proposal, that does not change.
They are now using AMSL.COM addresses when those role account
are inappropriate (or they don't have role accounts). I assume
that does not change. Correct?
Again, seems like a very good proposal and plan.
thanks,
john
--On Thursday, June 10, 2021 11:16 -0700 Fred Baker
<fredbaker.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks for this. Your proposed rule makes sense. I might have
> one suggestion.
>
> Where you have allocated an email address in IETF.org for an
> individual, duplicate that with an address in staff.IETF.org.
> That will allow you, at some point in the future, to remove
> the first set of addresses and continue communication with the
> second. I might suggest that those individuals start using the
> @staff email addresses so reduce any possible impact when that
> is done.
>
> JUst a thought.
