Dear Stephane and Viktor, There is a reason I put a smiley face after my comment about AAAA. I think the use of A is adequately motivated by text in the draft. Stephane: I'm not sure why the review was not marked as done but it is so marked now. Thanks, Donald =============================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 4:53 AM Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 04:18:59PM -0400, > Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote > a message of 45 lines which said: > > > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's > > ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the > > IESG. > > There is apparently some glitch on the datatracker since your review > is marked as not done yet > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis/reviewrequest/14679/>. > > > > One wonders if/when it might be better to use AAAA as the substitute > > QTYPE for minimized queries rather than A :-) > > There are two reasons to use A (probably the biggest changed since RFC > 7816): > > - minimize the risk of failure with broken middleboxes choking on > QTYPE they don't know, > - since the whole goal is privacy, you're more lost in the crowd with > A requests. > -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
