How about expanding "JWT" in the abstract and on first use in the body of this document. Thanks, Donald =============================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 4:41 PM The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The IESG has received a request from the Secure Telephone Identity Revisited > WG (stir) to consider the following document: - 'Enhanced JWT Claim > Constraints for STIR Certificates' > <draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-02.txt> as Proposed Standard > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > last-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2021-06-10. Exceptionally, comments may > be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning > of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > RFC 8226 provides a certificate extension to constrain the JWT claims > that can be included in the PASSporT as defined in RFC 8225. If the > signer includes a JWT claim outside the constraint boundaries, then > the recipient will reject the entire PASSporT. This document defines > an additional way that the JWT claims can be constrained. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226/ > > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > IETF-Announce mailing list > IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
