Thanks for the review, Al. > On 7 Jun 2021, at 3:47 am, Al Morton via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Al Morton > Review result: Ready > > Since this review was requested with a very short deadline, it only allows for > a "surgical" response. > > This draft obsoletes RFC 7234, and Appendix B lists the changes from RFC 7234. > Assuming this list is complete and correct, all of the changes appear to > improve the situation from an operational perspective, so it's good to go. > > Nit: == Unused Reference: 'RFC7234' is defined on line 1766, but no explicit > reference was found in the text I believe it's there because it's mentioned in the context of obsoletion (both in the Abstract and Introduction). Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
