Russ, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On 2021-5-6, at 20:49, Russ Housley via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Russ Housley > Review result: Almost Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-payload-rtp-jpegxs-12 > Reviewer: Russ Housley > Review Date: 2021-05-06 > IETF LC End Date: 2021-05-17 > IESG Telechat date: Unknown > > > Summary: Almost Ready > > > Major Concerns: > > Section 7.2.1: Does the SHALL related to [SMPTE-ST2110-10] only apply > when TP=2110TPNL or TP=2110TPW? Please reword to be clear when this > SHALL statement applies. > > > Minor Concerns: > > Section 3.3: I do not have [ISO21122-2], and obviously an implementer > will need that document. Can a bit more be said about "the profile" > and "the level and sublevel used" without making this document too > big? I am able to get a feel for the other things listed here from > their names. > > Section 3.4: Can you please provide some explanation of the "frat > field"? > > > Nits: > > Section 3.2: I do not understand the the last sentence? Is it the > same as: It represents sample values of a single image, without any > interpretation relative to a colour space. > > Section 5: s/of ST 2110-21 do not /of [SMPTE-ST2110-21] do not / > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call