Joel, thank you for your review and thank you all for the following discussion. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On 2021-5-14, at 23:34, Joel Halpern via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-02 > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review Date: 2021-05-14 > IETF LC End Date: 2021-05-24 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: This document is ready for publication as a proposed standard. > > I do have two questions that I hope has already been considered by the WG and > is a non-issue. See minor issues. > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > 1) I presume IANA has been involved in the development of this document, and is > willing to undertake the maintenance? I looked for but did not see where that > was noted. 2) I question the use of enumerations for the content. I understand > that since IANA will generate new YANG modules when there is a change, the new > models can have new values. I am concerned that if an implementation using the > older schema reads data from a DNS repository with updated entries (and the > corresponding updated version) the version skew will cause processing errors > instead of simply handing over the numeric value in a fashion that is > acceptable but not understood. > > Nits/editorial comments: > > > > -- > last-call mailing list > last-call@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
