John Levine <johnl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It appears that Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@xxxxxxxxx>
> said:
>> We might be able to pull this off, going forward, but we're doing
>> AUTH48 on drafts in the 9040 range now. I'd bet that there are a *lot
>> *of past authors who aren't reachable at an email address that the RFC
>> Editor knows about for a variety of reasons
> No kidding. Every month I mail a survey to authors and document
> shepherds of RFCs published the previous month. The author addreses
> are taken from the XML, the shepherds from the Datatracker. Every
> month a few of the messages bounce because the addresses are bad, even
> though they presumably worked less than a month ago.
Why are you not using draft-foo.all@ for the survey?
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
