Hi Jay,
I have no concerns about your proposed changes. I've created a PR here, in case others have an objection:
and will commit it at the conclusion of last call.
Thanks!
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 2:38 PM Jay Daley <jay@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Martin. This is well put together and will provide us with valuable guidance.
I’ve just given it a final review and I have a few points:
1. I'm increasingly nervous about a hard and fast 12 weeks in 3.1 I would prefer that either pushed out to 14 weeks or some flexibility in there "occurs within a period of ten to fourteen weeks"
2. I would prefer to drop "As a last resort" at the front of 4.4 as I don’t see this as a linear process where we eliminate one option after another, it’s more of a trade-off across all the options.
3. This text, which I should have spotted before, leads to too many complicated questions about charging a new fee for remote meetings, and links the financial impact on the LLC to a financial impact on attendees which seems unnecessary;
When a meeting becomes remote, the LLC SHOULD attempt to recover
whatever venue-related payments, past or future, it can and rebate
this to registered attendees, up to a maximum of their total cost
of registration.
The following text captures the expected process in this circumstance:
When a meeting becomes remote, the LLC MUST refund registered
attendees the difference between their paid registration fee and the
equivalent fee for a remote meeting. The LLC SHOULD offer refunds
to registered attendees who do not wish to attend a remote meeting.
thanks again
Jay
> On 11/06/2021, at 4:54 AM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> The IESG has received a request from the Stay Home Meet Only Online WG
> (shmoo) to consider the following document: - 'Considerations for
> Cancellation of IETF Meetings'
> <draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting-04.txt> as Best Current Practice
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
> comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> last-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2021-06-24. Exceptionally, comments may
> be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
> of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
> The IETF holds three in-person meetings per year to discuss and
> understand issues. However, various emergencies can make a planned
> in-person meeting infeasible. This document provides criteria for
> making this judgment.
>
>
>
>
> The file can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting/
>
>
>
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Manycouches mailing list
> Manycouches@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manycouches
>
--
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
jay@xxxxxxxx
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
