Hi Robert,
Thank you for your review, and your comments. The authors are reviewing the feedback and will update with accepted changes shortly.
Thank you,
Sarah (Doc Shepherd)
> On May 22, 2021, at 8:28 AM, Robert Sparks via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Robert Sparks
> Review result: Has Nits
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
> effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments
> were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document
> editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call
> comments.
>
> This document is essentially ready for publication as an Informational RFC, but
> with nits.
>
> Document reviewed: draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest-07
>
> This document describes a set of lab-environment characterization tests to be
> performed on isolated networks.
>
> The document has basic formatting issues (line and page length) that should be
> addressed before submission for publication as an RFC.
>
> The document does not discuss how the use of any of the mechanisms discussed in
> RFC7432 (and the RFCs it relies on) for improving the security characteristics
> of the protocols in use would affect the measurements being made, though it
> seems to suggest that the lab mimic production configuration. Perhaps that
> could be stated more clearly.
>
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
