IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-sztp-csr-11
- From: Yaron Sheffer via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang-23
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang-23
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang-23
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-09
- From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-09
- From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang-23
- From: Vincent Roca via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-calext-ical-relations-08
- Re: New IP (was: Re: Contractual Networking at IETF 112)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-samples-05
- From: Stewart Bryant via Datatracker
- Re: The leadership pipeline and WG chairs
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-faltstrom-unicode12-03
- From: Tim Chown via Datatracker
- Re: The leadership pipeline and WG chairs
- RE: The leadership pipeline and WG chairs
- Re: The leadership pipeline and WG chairs
- RE: The leadership pipeline and WG chairs
- Re: The leadership pipeline and WG chairs
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-guidance-03
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-guidance-03
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-guidance-03
- From: Scott Bradner via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-guidance-03
- From: Rich Salz via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-07
- From: Ron Bonica via Datatracker
- Re: The leadership pipeline and WG chairs
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp-02
- From: Karsten Meyer zu Selhausen
- Re: [Last-Call] rtgdir Last Call Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-10
- Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call partial review of draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp-02
- From: Karsten Meyer zu Selhausen
- RE: Monopolization in the Internet
- From: Maisonneuve, Julien (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
- Re: Monopolization in the Internet
- Monopolization in the Internet
- Re: The leadership pipeline and WG chairs
- Re: The leadership pipeline and WG chairs
- Re: The leadership pipeline and WG chairs
- Re: The leadership pipeline and WG chairs
- Re: The leadership pipeline and WG chairs
- Re: The leadership pipeline and WG chairs
- Re: The leadership pipeline and WG chairs
- From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Nov 14 06:00:02 2021
- Re: The leadership pipeline and WG chairs
- Re: The leadership pipeline and WG chairs
- Re: The leadership pipeline and WG chairs
- Re: The leadership pipeline and WG chairs
- Re: The leadership pipeline and WG chairs
- Re: The leadership pipeline and WG chairs
- Re: The leadership pipeline and WG chairs
- Re: The leadership pipeline and WG chairs
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-14
- Re: The leadership pipeline and WG chairs
- From: touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [Last-Call] rtgdir Last Call Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-10
- From: Joe Clarke (jclarke)
- Re: The leadership pipeline and WG chairs
- The leadership pipeline and WG chairs
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-14
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-14
- From: David Schinazi via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-samples-05
- From: Derrell Piper via Datatracker
- IETF 112 Meeting T-Shirts
- Re: LLC Board Meeting Details - 18 November 2021
- Re: LLC Board Meeting Details - 18 November 2021
- [Last-Call] rtgdir Last Call Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-10
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs-10
- From: Robert Sparks via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-rum-rue-09
- From: Rich Salz via Datatracker
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv-09
- From: Bob Halley via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-yang-14
- From: Xufeng Liu via Datatracker
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-guidance-03.txt> (Guidance for External PSK Usage in TLS) to Informational RFC
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: [Last-Call] [calsify] Feedback on draft-ietf-calext-ical-relations
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-calext-ical-relations-08
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rum-rue-09
- From: Matt Joras via Datatracker
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-09
- From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- Re: [Last-Call] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-09
- From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-zern-webp-05
- RE: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: [IRTF-Announce] Applied Networking Research Prize awards at IETF 112
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: New IP (was: Re: Contractual Networking at IETF 112)
- Re: Contractual Networking at IETF 112
- Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Nov 7 06:00:02 2021
- RE: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-zern-webp-05
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp-02
- From: Yoav Nir via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-path-vector-19
- From: Samuel Weiler via Datatracker
- Re: Contractual Networking at IETF 112
- Re: Contractual Networking at IETF 112
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-16
- [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-16
- From: David Mandelberg via Datatracker
- New IP (was: Re: Contractual Networking at IETF 112)
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Contractual Networking at IETF 112
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Why IPv6 failed [Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]]
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- RE: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- RE: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- Re: [112attendees] [Manycouches] gather HotRFC problems
- Re: [Manycouches] [112attendees] gather HotRFC problems
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: [112attendees] [Manycouches] gather HotRFC problems
- Re: [112attendees] [Manycouches] gather HotRFC problems
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [Manycouches] [112attendees] gather HotRFC problems
- RE: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- RE: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: [112attendees] gather HotRFC problems
- Re: [Manycouches] [112attendees] gather HotRFC problems
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: [112attendees] gather HotRFC problems
- Re: [Manycouches] gather HotRFC problems
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- Re: [Last-Call] [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-guidance-03.txt> (Guidance for External PSK Usage in TLS) to Informational RFC
- Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-guidance-03
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- RE: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- RE: "professional" in an IETF context
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-07
- From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-guidance-03
- From: Martin Thomson via Datatracker
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: [112attendees] gather HotRFC problems
- Re: [112attendees] gather HotRFC problems
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [112attendees] gather HotRFC problems
- Re: [112attendees] gather HotRFC problems
- Re: gather HotRFC problems
- gather HotRFC problems
- RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Ancient history (was Accurate history was [Re: "professional" in an IETF context])
- From: Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- Re: Ancient history (was Accurate history was [Re: "professional" in an IETF context])
- Re: Ancient history (was Accurate history was [Re: "professional" in an IETF context])
- RE: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-05
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- Re: [Last-Call] [Anima] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-05
- interface ID (was Re: "professional" in an IETF context)
- RE: "professional" in an IETF context
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-zern-webp-05
- Re: [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-18
- Re: [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-18
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- Re: [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-18
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-04
- From: Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [Anima] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-05
- Re: [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-18
- Re: [Last-Call] [Anima] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-05
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-zern-webp-05
- Re: It's a trap (Re: "professional" in an IETF context)
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-09
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-09
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- Relitigating history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
- It's a trap (Re: "professional" in an IETF context)
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-09
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- Re: [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-05
- Re: [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-05
- [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-05
- From: Russ Housley via Datatracker
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- From: Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- [Last-Call] Artart last call partial review of draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp-02
- From: Julian Reschke via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-18
- From: Henning Rogge via Datatracker
- RE: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-09
- From: Michael Scharf via Datatracker
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- RE: "professional" in an IETF context
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06
- From: Elwyn Davies via Datatracker
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- "professional" in an IETF context
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-zern-webp-05
- From: Tim Chown via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-calext-ical-relations-08
- From: Christer Holmberg via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-09
- From: Tim Chown via Datatracker
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Oct 31 06:00:02 2021
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- [Last-Call] IETF last call review of draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
- Re: [Last-Call] [calsify] Feedback on draft-ietf-calext-ical-relations
- Jonathan B. Postel Award 2021
- Facebook changes name to Meta
- Re: [Last-Call] [calsify] Feedback on draft-ietf-calext-ical-relations
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- Re: [Last-Call] Feedback on draft-ietf-calext-ical-relations
- From: Francesca Palombini
- Re: [Last-Call] [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements-12
- From: Francesca Palombini
- Re: [Last-Call] [sfc] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv-08
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-09
- From: Sheng Jiang via Datatracker
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- Upcoming Community Consultations on Next Generation RFC Model
- Re: [Last-Call] [alto] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-path-vector-17
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-path-vector-17
- Re: [Last-Call] [alto] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-alto-path-vector-17
- [Last-Call] Feedback on draft-ietf-calext-ical-relations
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04
- From: Shwetha Bhandari via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs-10
- From: Mark Nottingham via Datatracker
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- From: Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- Re: [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case-09
- [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case-09
- From: Andy Smith via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-calext-ical-relations-08
- From: Catherine Meadows via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-09
- Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-09
- CFP: Virtual HotRFC lightning talks for IETF-112
- Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-09
- [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements-13
- From: Ron Bonica via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements-12
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-09
- Re: [Last-Call] [Tsv-art] [Lwip] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-06
- [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-03
- From: Stig Venaas via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-18
- From: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
- Re: [Last-Call] [kitten] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-kitten-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13-09
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-09
- Re: [Last-Call] [kitten] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-kitten-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13-09
- Re: [Last-Call] [kitten] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-kitten-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13-09
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-03
- From: Daniel Migault via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [kitten] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-kitten-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13-09
- IETF 112 Standard Registration Deadline and Internet Draft Submission Cut-off Today!
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: tools.ietf.org -- basics not working?
- Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-17
- Re: tools.ietf.org -- basics not working?
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-09
- From: Gyan Mishra via Datatracker
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: [Last-Call] [art] Artart last call review of draft-zern-webp-03
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- RE: Protocol Action: 'Updating References to the IETF FTP Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-danyliw-replace-ftp-pointers-06.txt)
- RE: Protocol Action: 'Updating References to the IETF FTP Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-danyliw-replace-ftp-pointers-06.txt)
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-15
- IETF 112 Standard Registration Deadline and Internet Draft Submission Cut-off Approaching
- Re: Protocol Action: 'Updating References to the IETF FTP Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-danyliw-replace-ftp-pointers-06.txt)
- [Last-Call] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-bess-pbb-evpn-isid-cmacflush
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: Workload constants [was I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt]
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: Workload constants [was I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt]
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: Workload constants [was I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt]
- draft-klensin-nomcom-term-02 (was: [was: draft-rsalz-termlimits] and draft-leiba-term-limit-guidance-00
- Re: Workload constants [was I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt]
- Re: Workload constants [was I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt]
- Re: Workload constants [was I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt]
- Re: [Last-Call] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-raw-ldacs
- From: Dr. Corinna Schmitt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
- RE: Thanks to Adrian Farrel for this service as ISE!
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: [Last-Call] [art] Artart last call review of draft-zern-webp-03
- Re: Workload constants [was I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt]
- draft-leiba-term-limit-guidance-00 [was: draft-rsalz-termlimits]
- Workload constants [was I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt]
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-17
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- RE: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gendispatch] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gendispatch] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- RE: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gendispatch] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gendispatch] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Last-Call] [art] Artart last call review of draft-zern-webp-03
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
- Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-quota-06
- From: Francesca Palombini
- Re: [Last-Call] [Jmap] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-jmap-smime-08
- From: Francesca Palombini
- Re: [Last-Call] [art] Artart last call review of draft-zern-webp-03
- Re: [Last-Call] [art] Artart last call review of draft-zern-webp-03
- Re: Agenda item request
- Re: [Last-Call] [art] Artart last call review of draft-zern-webp-03
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gendispatch] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
- Agenda item request
- Re: [Gendispatch] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Gendispatch] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Gendispatch] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
- Re: BCP97bis a process problem
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-18
- From: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gendispatch] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available"
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-18
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-18
- Re: BCP97bis a process problem
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-11
- From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-18
- From: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
- RE: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available"
- Re: BCP97bis a process problem
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available"
- Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-17
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available"
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available"
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available"
- RE: Think outside the box - Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available"
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available"
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available"
- Re: Think outside the box - Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Call for nominations: Applied Networking Research Prize 2022
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis a process problem
- BCP written by another AD [was Re: BCP97bis]
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available"
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available"
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available"
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available"
- Re: [Last-Call] [alto] [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-17
- Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-17
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis a process problem
- RE: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: [Last-Call] [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-17
- [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-17
- From: Christian Amsüss via Datatracker
- Re: BCP97bis
- RE: BCP97bis
- BCP97bis and "freely available"
- Re: BCP97bis
- RE: BCP97bis
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-12
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-control-05
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-kitten-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13-09
- RE: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-07
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-kitten-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13-09
- Re: BCP97bis
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: Status change of HTTP experiments to Historic
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- [Last-Call] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-jmap-smime-09
- From: Peter Yee via Datatracker
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Oct 17 06:00:02 2021
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: tools.ietf.org -- basics not working?
- RE: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- RE: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis and Informational-as-Standard
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: tools.ietf.org -- basics not working?
- Re: BCP97bis
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: Status change of HTTP experiments to Historic
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-kitten-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13-09
- Re: [Last-Call] [art] Artart last call review of draft-zern-webp-03
- Re: [Last-Call] [art] Artart last call review of draft-zern-webp-03
- IETF 112 Final Agenda
- Re: tools.ietf.org -- basics not working?
- tools.ietf.org -- basics not working?
- Re: BCP97bis
- Re: BCP97bis
- BCP97bis
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- CFP: Virtual HotRFC lightning talks for IETF-112
- [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-09
- From: Pascal Thubert via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [kitten] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-kitten-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13-09
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-kitten-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13-09
- Re: [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-07
- Re: [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-07
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-kitten-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13-09
- From: Dale Worley via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-15
- From: Ines Robles via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [kitten] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-kitten-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13-09
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-faltstrom-unicode12-03
- From: Russ Housley via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-09
- Re: Think outside the box - Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: Think outside the box - Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: Think outside the box - Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-kitten-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13-09
- From: Niclas Comstedt via Datatracker
- Re: [Manycouches] Think outside the box - Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: [Manycouches] Think outside the box - Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Applied Networking Research Prize awards at IETF 112
- Re: [Manycouches] Think outside the box - Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: [Manycouches] Think outside the box - Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Think outside the box - Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: [Last-Call] [art] Artart last call review of draft-zern-webp-03
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-15
- From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-zern-webp-04
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-zern-webp-04
- From: Tero Kivinen via Datatracker
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-15
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-zern-webp-03
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-09
- [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-11
- From: Scott Bradner via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-quota-06
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-jmap-smime-07
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-09
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-07
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-07
- From: Chris Lonvick via Datatracker
- Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Oct 10 06:00:20 2021
- Re: IETF 114 in the USA
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-07
- From: Ines Robles via Datatracker
- IETF 112 Preliminary Agenda
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- RE: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-09
- From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-19
- Report on the RFC 8989 experiment
- Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-19
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- RE: What is "The Internet community" ? Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: What is "The Internet community" ? Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: What is "The Internet community" ? Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: What is "The Internet community" ? Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- What is "The Internet community" ? Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- RE: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-09
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- leadership bodily presence requirements (was: Re: Want to be on the IESG?)
- RE: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: [Last-Call] [regext] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-17
- From: Joe Clarke (jclarke)
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-jmap-smime-09.txt> (S/MIME signature verification extension to JMAP) to Proposed Standard
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-extra-quota-07.txt> (IMAP QUOTA Extension) to Proposed Standard
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-09
- From: Derek Atkins via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [regext] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-17
- Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-zern-webp-03
- Re: [Last-Call] [regext] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-17
- [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-17
- From: Joe Clarke via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04
- From: Joel Halpern via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [regext] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-17
- From: Francesca Palombini
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-09
- From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-trill-multilevel-single-nickname-15
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
- [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-trill-multilevel-single-nickname-15
- From: Samuel Weiler via Datatracker
- RE: I'm happy to nominate you for leadership openings
- From: g_e_montenegro=40yahoo . com
- Second Call for Nominations
- Re: IETF 114 in the USA
- Re: IETF 114 in the USA
- Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-19
- RE: IETF 114 in the USA
- From: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: Facebook DNS issue
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]