Re: The leadership pipeline and WG chairs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I thought that the call for IPR was sent to the WG mailing list - but the rules 
say that disclosure is not dependent on someone asking

Scott

> On Nov 14, 2021, at 6:41 PM, Toerless Eckert <tte@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 11:49:33AM +1300, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> Why? We are *all* covered by BCP79 the moment we open our mouths or send
>> an email with content "that is intended to affect the IETF Standards Process"
>> [RFC8179]. Being a listed contributor doesn't increase our obligation to
>> disclose IPR, although it does perhaps draw attention to it.
> 
> Correct me if i am wrong, but we are only doing explicit
> ask for IPR against authors (should be contributors), according
> to section 5.1.1. Not against section 5.1.2 - because we can't
> (we don't know whom we would have to ask).
> 
> Cheers
>    Toerless
> 





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux