Mark: thank you for this review! And thanks to the authors for addressing it. I am moving the document forward to IESG evaluation.
Francesca
From: Mathias Bynens <mths@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, 3 December 2021 at 13:53
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: art@xxxxxxxx <art@xxxxxxxx>, dispatch@xxxxxxxx <dispatch@xxxxxxxx>, draft-ietf-dispatch-_javascript_-mjs.all@xxxxxxxx <draft-ietf-dispatch-_javascript_-mjs.all@xxxxxxxx>, last-call@xxxxxxxx <last-call@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Artart last call review of draft-ietf-dispatch-_javascript_-mjs-10
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 11:10 PM Mark Nottingham via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Mark Nottingham
Review result: Ready with Nits
This document is ready for publication, with two small nits / questions about
the content.
## Nits
- In Section 3, the reader is left hanging -- I expected a statement along the
lines of 'The media types in this document allow such out of band information
to be conveyed.'
- Throughout, the phrase 'is not considered part of this document' is a bit odd
-- do you mean 'is not controlled by this document' or similar?
|
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
