Ines, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On 2021-11-29, at 22:42, Ines Robles via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Ines Robles > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-10 > Reviewer: Ines Robles > Review Date: 2021-11-29 > IETF LC End Date: 2021-11-29 > IESG Telechat date: 2022-01-06 > > Summary: > > The document describes a scheme that allows an HTTP client to communicate its > preferences for how the upstream server prioritizes responses to its requests, > and also allows a server to hint to a downstream intermediary how its responses > should be prioritized when they are forwarded. > > The document does not present major issues, just one minor nit. > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > > Page 6: "Multiple experiments from independent research have shown" --> please > add references to this claim > > Thank you for this document, > > Ines. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
