Hi Ines,
Thank you for the review and providing feedback.
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 8:42 PM Ines Robles via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Ines Robles
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-10
Reviewer: Ines Robles
Review Date: 2021-11-29
IETF LC End Date: 2021-11-29
IESG Telechat date: 2022-01-06
Summary:
The document describes a scheme that allows an HTTP client to communicate its
preferences for how the upstream server prioritizes responses to its requests,
and also allows a server to hint to a downstream intermediary how its responses
should be prioritized when they are forwarded.
The document does not present major issues, just one minor nit.
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
Page 6: "Multiple experiments from independent research have shown" --> please
add references to this claim
Please see https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1800 which addresses this nit
Cheers,
Lucas
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
