The YANG modules in this I-D contains lots of references - good - but
they need including in the I-D References and since anchors must not
appear in the YANG module, then the text string in the YANG reference
must map readily, and consistently, to that I-D Reference.
In the YANG modules, I see
RFC2014. -
RFC7748. -
RFC8032. -
RFC8017. -
ISO/IEC 9797-1:2011
ISO/IEC 9797-2
ISO/IEC 10116.
ISO/IEC 10118-3.
ISO/IEC 10118-3:2018.
ISO/IEC 14888-3.
ISO/IEC 15946-1.
ISO/IEC 18033-3.
IEEE Std 1363-2000
IEEE Std 1363a-2004.
GB/T 32907-2016.
GB/T 32918.1-2016
GB/T 32918.2-2016,
GB/T 32918.3-2016,
GB/T 32918.4-2016
GB/T 32918.5-2017
NIST PUB FIPS 202.
NIST SP800-38C.
NIST SP800-38D.
NIST SP800-38F.
NIST SP800-56A.
NIST SP800-108
https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/resource/
tcg-efi-platform-specification/ I
TCG TPM 2.0 library specification. N
TCG Algorithm Registry Revision 01.32 Table 2
TCG Algorithm Registry Revision 01.32 Table 3
TPM-Rev-2.0-Part-1-Architecture-01.07-2014-03-13.pdf
TPM-Main-Part-2-TPM-Structures_v1.2_rev116_01032011.pdf
http://trustedcomputinggroup.org/resource/tcg-algorithm-registry/
TCG-_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub N
https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/
PC-ClientSpecific_Platform_Profile_for_TPM_2p0_Systems_v51.pdf
https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/
TPM-Rev-2.0-Part-1-Architecture-01.38.pdf";
https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/
TPM-Rev-2.0-Part-2-Structures-01.38.pdf
https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/
TPM-main-1.2-Rev94-part-2.pdf N
https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads
/TPM-Main-Part-3-Commands_v1.2_rev116_01032011.pdf
https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/
uploads/TCG_IWG_DevID_v1r2_02dec2020.pdf N
https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/
TCG_IWG_CEL_v1_r0p30_13feb2021.pdf N
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy N
And, of course, they need adding, as anchors, to the body of the I-D
lest they appear as unused references. Perhaps a Section 1.2.
Tom Petch
On 14/01/2022 16:16, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Remote ATtestation ProcedureS WG
(rats) to consider the following document: - 'A YANG Data Model for
Challenge-Response-based Remote Attestation
Procedures using TPMs'
<draft-ietf-rats-yang-tpm-charra-12.txt> as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
last-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2022-01-28. Exceptionally, comments may
be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
This document defines YANG RPCs and a small number of configuration
nodes required to retrieve attestation evidence about integrity
measurements from a device, following the operational context defined
in TPM-based Network Device Remote Integrity Verification.
Complementary measurement logs are also provided by the YANG RPCs,
originating from one or more roots of trust for measurement (RTMs).
The module defined requires at least one TPM 1.2 or TPM 2.0 as well
as a corresponding TPM Software Stack (TSS), included in the device
components of the composite device the YANG server is running on.
The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rats-yang-tpm-charra/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
The document contains these normative downward references.
See RFC 3967 for additional information:
draft-ietf-rats-tpm-based-network-device-attest: TPM-based Network Device Remote Integrity Verification (None - Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF))
draft-ietf-rats-architecture: Remote Attestation Procedures Architecture (None - Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF))
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
.
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
