It appears that Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> said: >> In this case I think you're better off treating it as text. The only >> advantage of the code license is that you can modify the code, but it >> doesn't sound like that's an issue here. > >If the pseudocode has any value, it would be to serve as framework >for an actual implementation. Both solutions seem wrong for that. > >Frankly I'd prefer if it could be a DWTFYWWI license, but I don't think >the IETF Trust has one of those. Maybe we need a CC0 option too? The trust license is non-exclusive. As the author, you can let people do whatever you want with the stuff you wrote. R's, John PS: The BSD license is effectively DWTFYWWIBDSU, where those last letters stand for But Don't Sue Us.
