Linda, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Authors, would you please respond to Linda's questions/suggestions? Thanks, Lars > On 2021-11-4, at 5:19, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-07 > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > Review Date: 2021-11-03 > IETF LC End Date: 2021-11-16 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > > I am a little confused if this draft is to describe the challenges of ACME ? > or if the term "ACME challenges" in the title is used to represent something > special? Is "Authority Token challenge" to represent the challenge of > Authority Token? > > What is the difference between the "Authority Token Challenge element" and the > "Authority Tokey Challenge object"? > > Does the "ACME Challenge" the same as the "ACME challenge"? > Can authors add the definitions to the Terminology section? > > Thank you very much > Linda Dunbar > > > -- > last-call mailing list > last-call@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
