Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-07

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linda, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document.

Authors, would you please respond to Linda's questions/suggestions?

Thanks,
Lars



> On 2021-11-4, at 5:19, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-07
> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review Date: 2021-11-03
> IETF LC End Date: 2021-11-16
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary:
> 
> I am a little confused if this draft is to describe the challenges of ACME ?
> or if the term  "ACME challenges" in the title is used to represent something
> special? Is "Authority Token challenge"  to represent the challenge of
> Authority Token?
> 
> What is the difference between the "Authority Token Challenge element" and the
> "Authority Tokey Challenge object"?
> 
> Does the "ACME Challenge" the same as the "ACME challenge"?
> Can authors add the definitions to the Terminology section?
> 
> Thank you very much
> Linda Dunbar
> 
> 
> --
> last-call mailing list
> last-call@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux