> * The use of "RECOMMENDED" and "NOT RECOMMENDED" for an
Applicability Statement comes straight out of RFC 2026, not
anything associated with TLS or any recent set of specific
specs. And because Applicability Statements are Standards Track
documents, the _only_ way those assignments can be made is by
IETF Consensus.
This was the point I missed. (And I was only using TLS registry as an example with which I am familiar)
> "NOT RECOMMENDED" in addition to "YES" and "NO ANSWER", then I
suggest the revision effort should be considering that if it is
not already.
Yes, this is under discussion.
> So I think that probably we are in complete agreement. If we
are not, one of us is seriously confused.
We seem to be yes. Good. Probably my confusion.
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
