> On Dec 15, 2021, at 5:33 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Brian E Carpenter wrote on 13/12/2021 21:34: >> Do people think it's a good or bad idea to label pseudocode >> in an RFC with <CODE BEGINS>? > > it seems unnecessary? Pseudocode is aimed at humans rather than computers, so a friendly lead-in might be more accessible. > > If there were a strict grammar defined for pseudocode, i.e. to the point that you could feed it into a parser and get useful output, then there would be an argument for a delimiter token. I agree, it not necessary to have a delimiter token. Just say something like: A suggested algorithm in pseudo code for <foo> is as follows: in the document. It is essentially just text. Bob
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
