Isaac --
Just looked at your summary of outstanding issues from March 2021: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rum/53dWz_sO88FEwR65l8txv922wEY/
The TSVART review does indeed touch on at least two of the concerns you listed at that time.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 6:28 PM Isaac Roach <iroach@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think these concerns validate many of the issues previously raised that have not been resolved.Thanks,IsaacOn Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 6:03 PM Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 12/3/21 1:29 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote:
>> I don’t see anything in 8835 that requires dual stack.
>
> [BA] 8835 does require being able to handle IPv6 addresses and candidates. But again, those requirements would apply to the WebRTC side of the gateway, not necessarily to the “RUE” side.
I think there may be some confusion here. The idea is that both IPv4 and
IPv6 MUST be supported. But a dual stack implementation isn't required.
In lieu of that it is sufficient to have DNS route the SIP call to
separate sip servers for IPv4 and IPv6. And then each of those could
then support media of the same flavor as the sip.
Thanks,
Paul
--
Rum mailing list
Rum@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rum
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
