I am, sorry, Warren, but I personally cannot support this draft because Section 4 offends me. I do, however, want to commend you for the number of revisions you have made.
Eliot
On 22.11.21 21:09, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 2:19 PM Nick Hilliard <nick@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
John Levine wrote on 22/11/2021 18:50:
> But does anyone have any idea what this "report' might be?
draft-petrescu-v6ops-ipv6-power-ipv4?
Quick! Someone reference https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wkumari-not-a-draft/ :-P
W
The methodology raises questions about whether the results are reliable
enough to be quoted.
Nick
--
The computing scientist’s main challenge is not to get confused by the
complexities of his own making.
-- E. W. Dijkstra
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
