Re: Want to be on the IESG?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Monday, November 8, 2021 09:23 -0600 Spencer Dawkins at
IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi, Rich,
> 
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 8:43 AM Salz, Rich <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>>    - And I still think evaluating incumbents, especially on
>>    the IESG, was a good idea, then, and now.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Did you have any specifics in mind?
>> 
> 
> I'd start by looking at
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-klensin-nomcom-incumbent
> s-first-01.tx
> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-klensin-nomcom-incumben
> ts-first-01.txt>t, and figuring out what needs to be updated.

Or at draft-klensin-nomcom-term-02
(<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-klensin-nomcom-term/>)
-- the version discussed during gendispatch -- to see what I
botched in the update, because things have changed, because the
ideas were not fully baked the first time around, or because I
was just in too much of a hurry.

   john





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux