RE: Question about pseudocode and <CODE BEGINS>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+1
The delimiter is unnecessary for humans.
But pseudo-code could not be processed by a machine - no standard interpretation.
Ed/
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nick Hilliard
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2021 4:33 PM
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Question about pseudocode and <CODE BEGINS>

Brian E Carpenter wrote on 13/12/2021 21:34:
> Do people think it's a good or bad idea to label pseudocode in an RFC 
> with <CODE BEGINS>?

it seems unnecessary?  Pseudocode is aimed at humans rather than computers, so a friendly lead-in might be more accessible.

If there were a strict grammar defined for pseudocode, i.e. to the point that you could feed it into a parser and get useful output, then there would be an argument for a delimiter token.

Nick





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux