Hi dkg, On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 03:11:56PM +0200, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > I appreciate your catching these unexpanded acronyms. I am happy to add > expansions for them, or maybe just outbound references if that seems > appropriate. > > "OCSP" and "CRL" appear in the draft in reference to certificate > indicators, meaning specific X.509 extensions; for OCSP i would refer to > id-ad-ocsp in the Authority Information Access X.509 extension > (i.e., §4.2.2.1 of RFC 5280), and for CRL i would refer to the CRL > Distribution Points X.509 extension (i.e., §4.2.1.13 of RFC 5280). > > For "PEM encoding" I would add an informative reference to RFC 7468, > where §5 describes certificates and §10 describes private keys. > > Would that be a useful set of changes to the document? IMHO, yes. Thanks, Ben -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
