Stewart, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On 2021-11-16, at 16:55, Stewart Bryant via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Stewart Bryant > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-lamps-samples-05 > Reviewer: Stewart Bryant > Review Date: 2021-11-16 > IETF LC End Date: 2021-11-26 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: A well written document ready for publication > > Major issues:None > > Minor issues:None > > Nits/editorial comments: > The following terms were used without prior definition in the text: PEM, OCSP, > CRL - they are well known in the security community, but not in the RFC Editor > list of well known terms not needing expansion on first use. > > Sections 11 and 12 have no content and can be removed. > > > > -- > last-call mailing list > last-call@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
