On 28 Nov 2021, at 17:04, John C Klensin wrote: > So, while I believe this document should be published whether we have a plan going > forward or not, I hope we will soon see a plan in the very near future so this document does not end up acting as a tombstone on IDNA2008 reviews of changes introduced by new Unicode versions. FWIW, this is exactly the same view as mine. Patrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
