IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: [Last-Call] [Extra] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-sieve-action-registry-05
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types-11
  • From: Jürgen Schönwälder via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [Jmap] secdir review of draft-ietf-jmap-quotas
  • From: rcordier
• [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-mls-protocol-17
  • From: Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker
• Re: Clarification regarding URI (RFC3986) spec followed by HTTP (RFC9110)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Clarification regarding URI (RFC3986) spec followed by HTTP (RFC9110)
  • From: Martin J. Dürst
• Re: [Last-Call] [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: Michael McBride
• Re: [Last-Call] [Manycouches] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee-05
  • From: John Scudder
• Re: [Last-Call] [Manycouches] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee-05
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Last-Call] [Manycouches] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee-05
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] [Manycouches] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee-05
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Last-Call] [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: Acee Lindem
• Re: IESG Statement on Guidance on In-Person and Online Interim Meetings
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: Clarification regarding URI (RFC3986) spec followed by HTTP (RFC9110)
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: Magnus Westerlund
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: Magnus Westerlund
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: Magnus Westerlund
• Re: Clarification regarding URI (RFC3986) spec followed by HTTP (RFC9110)
  • From: John C Klensin
• [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-mls-architecture-10
  • From: Tatuya Jinmei via Datatracker
• Re: Clarification regarding URI (RFC3986) spec followed by HTTP (RFC9110)
  • From: Martin J. Dürst
• Re: [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-12.txt> (OAuth 2.0 Demonstrating Proof-of-Possession at the Application Layer (DPoP)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Brian Campbell
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: Magnus Westerlund
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: Magnus Westerlund
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
• Re: [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
• [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-04
  • From: Vincent Roca via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: Magnus Westerlund
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-12.txt> (OAuth 2.0 Demonstrating Proof-of-Possession at the Application Layer (DPoP)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Joseph Salowey
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: Chris Lonvick via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [Eligibility-discuss] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• NomCom 2022 Announcement of IESG
  • From: NomCom Chair 2022
• Re: [Last-Call] [Eligibility-discuss] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: [Last-Call] [Tsv-art] [Eligibility-discuss] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: [Last-Call] [Eligibility-discuss] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] [Manycouches] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee-05
  • From: Mirja Kuehlewind
• Re: [Last-Call] [Eligibility-discuss] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] [Tsv-art] [Eligibility-discuss] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] [Eligibility-discuss] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
  • From: Vincent Roca
• Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee-05
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Last-Call] [Eligibility-discuss] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
  • From: Reese Enghardt
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-12.txt> (OAuth 2.0 Demonstrating Proof-of-Possession at the Application Layer (DPoP)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Brian Campbell
• Re: [Last-Call] [Eligibility-discuss] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Last-Call] [Emu] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types-10
  • From: Alan DeKok
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [Last-Call] [Eligibility-discuss] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
  • From: Martin Duke
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
  • From: Martin Duke
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
  • From: Martin Duke
• Re: [Last-Call] [Eligibility-discuss] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
  • From: Martin Duke
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
  • From: Martin Duke
• Re: Clarification regarding URI (RFC3986) spec followed by HTTP (RFC9110)
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: [Last-Call] [Manycouches] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee-05
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee-05
  • From: Mirja Kuehlewind
• Re: Clarification regarding URI (RFC3986) spec followed by HTTP (RFC9110)
  • From: Raghu Saxena
• Re: Clarification regarding URI (RFC3986) spec followed by HTTP (RFC9110)
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Clarification regarding URI (RFC3986) spec followed by HTTP (RFC9110)
  • From: Raghu Saxena
• Re: [Last-Call] [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-opsec-indicators-of-compromise-03
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: Roni Even via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types-10
  • From: Thomas Fossati via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [Manycouches] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee-05
  • From: John C Klensin
• IETF 116 General Information, Social Event, and Childcare
  • From: IETF Secretariat
• [Last-Call] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-acme-integrations-12
  • From: Ted Lemon via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-stir-passport-rcd-23
  • From: Vincent Roca via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-jmap-blob-17
  • From: Jaime Jiménez
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
  • From: Vincent Roca via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [Manycouches] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee-05
  • From: Jay Daley
• [Last-Call] Dnsdir last call review of draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-10
  • From: Nicolai Leymann via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee-05
  • From: John Klensin via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: Mike McBride via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [EXTERNAL] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-hystartplusplus-12
  • From: Yi Huang
• Re: [Last-Call] [lp-wan] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox-20
  • From: Sergio Aguilar Romero
• FINAL REMINDER: Please take the IETF Community Survey for 2022
  • From: IETF Executive Director
• Re: [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee-05
  • From: Mirja Kuehlewind
• [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee-05
  • From: Nicolai Leymann via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-12.txt> (OAuth 2.0 Demonstrating Proof-of-Possession at the Application Layer (DPoP)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Joseph Salowey
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-hystartplusplus-12
  • From: Mohit Sethi via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
  • From: Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ace-extend-dtls-authorize-05
  • From: Paul Kyzivat
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
  • From: Al Morton via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ace-extend-dtls-authorize-05
  • From: John Mattsson
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-12.txt> (OAuth 2.0 Demonstrating Proof-of-Possession at the Application Layer (DPoP)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Brian Campbell
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox-20
  • From: elwynd
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox-20
  • From: Sergio Aguilar Romero
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-12.txt> (OAuth 2.0 Demonstrating Proof-of-Possession at the Application Layer (DPoP)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Joseph Salowey
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-integrations-12
  • From: Tim Evens via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-12
  • From: Brian Campbell
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-12
  • From: Benjamin Schwartz via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-davies-int-historic-05
  • From: Timothy Winters
• [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-davies-int-historic-05
  • From: Timothy Winters via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ace-extend-dtls-authorize-05
  • From: Paul Kyzivat
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lake-edhoc-18
  • From: Göran Selander
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lake-edhoc-18
  • From: Göran Selander
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-acme-integrations-12
  • From: Bo Wu via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ace] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-05
  • From: Mohit Sahni
• [Last-Call] Dnsdir telechat review of draft-moskowitz-ipsecme-ipseckey-eddsa-09
  • From: Johan Stenstam via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-acme-integrations-12
  • From: Joseph Salowey via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] secdir review of draft-ietf-jmap-quotas
  • From: rcordier
• Re: [Last-Call] [tcpm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-hystartplusplus-12.txt> (HyStart++: Modified Slow Start for TCP) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Praveen Balasubramanian
• Re: [Last-Call] [Eligibility-discuss] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: [Last-Call] secdir review of draft-ietf-jmap-quotas
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: [Last-Call] [Eligibility-discuss] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• NomCom 2022 Announcement of IETF LLC Board
  • From: NomCom Chair 2022
• Re: [Last-Call] [homenet] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation-25
  • From: Daniel Migault
• Re: [Last-Call] [homenet] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation-25
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-13
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: [Last-Call] Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-13
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• [Last-Call] Yangdoctors telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-13
  • From: Martin Björklund via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-13
  • From: Mach Chen via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
  • From: Bernard Aboba via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
  • From: Reese Enghardt via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-opsec-indicators-of-compromise-03
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• Re: [Last-Call] [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-opsec-indicators-of-compromise-03
  • From: Andrew S2
• Re: [Last-Call] [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-opsec-indicators-of-compromise-03
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee-05
  • From: Mirja Kuehlewind
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-indicators-of-compromise-03
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-06
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp-06
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-subdomains-04
  • From: Lars Eggert
• [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc7983bis-07
  • From: Yoshifumi Nishida via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-mls-architecture-10
  • From: Yoav Nir via Datatracker
• Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Jan 15 06:00:02 2023
  • From: John Levine
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee-05
  • From: Gyan Mishra via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp-06
  • From: Wassim Haddad via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc7983bis-07
  • From: Meral Shirazipour via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-opsec-indicators-of-compromise-03
  • From: Dave Thaler via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [homenet] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation-25
  • From: Daniel Migault
• NomCom 2022 Announcement of IETF Trust Selection
  • From: NomCom Chair 2022
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-12
  • From: Lars Eggert
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc7983bis-07
  • From: Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ace-extend-dtls-authorize
  • From: tirumal reddy
• Re: [Last-Call] [tcpm] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-14
  • From: Vidhi Goel
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-indicators-of-compromise-03
  • From: Kathleen Moriarty via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10.txt> (Publish/Subscribe Functionality for the Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Joel Halpern
• Re: [Last-Call] [dnsdir] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-add-encrypted-dns-07
  • From: Ralf Weber
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-09
  • From: tuexen
• Re: [Pearg] [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Luigi Iannone
• Re: [Last-Call] [homenet] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation-25
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: [Last-Call] [DNSOP] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-08
  • From: Willem Toorop
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-09
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-09
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [Pearg] [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [Last-Call] [tcpm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-hystartplusplus-12.txt> (HyStart++: Modified Slow Start for TCP) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Neal Cardwell
• [Last-Call] secdir review of draft-ietf-jmap-quotas
  • From: Wes Hardaker
• [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-integrations-12
  • From: John Levine via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee-05
  • From: Kyle Rose via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-add-encrypted-dns-07
  • From: Joe Clarke (jclarke)
• Re: Re: [saag] [hrpc] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: wanzerbusi=40yahoo . co . jp
• Re: [Last-Call] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-add-encrypted-dns-07
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• [Last-Call] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-add-encrypted-dns-07
  • From: Ralf Weber via Datatracker
• Re: [saag] [hrpc] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-sieve-action-registry-05
  • From: Yoshiro Yoneya via Datatracker
• Re: [saag] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [saag] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc7983bis-07
  • From: Rich Salz via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
  • From: Scott Hollenbeck via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-09
  • From: tuexen
• Re: [saag] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: [Last-Call] [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-09
  • From: touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-09
  • From: Michael Tüxen via Datatracker
• Re: [saag] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Tony Rutkowski
• Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-10
  • From: Ben Schwartz
• Re: [Last-Call] [homenet] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation-25
  • From: Daniel Migault
• Re: [saag] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• REMINDER: IETF 116 Early Bird Registration Deadline Approaching
  • From: IETF Secretariat
• [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-11
  • From: Tommy Pauly via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc7983bis-07
  • From: Marc Blanchet via Datatracker
• Re: [Pearg] times square 15 sec delay new years
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Kyle Rose
• Re: [Pearg] times square 15 sec delay new years
  • From: Jens Finkhaeuser
• Re: [Pearg] times square 15 sec delay new years
  • From: Jens Finkhaeuser
• Re: [saag] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Tony Rutkowski
• Re: [hrpc] [Pearg] [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [saag] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [hrpc] [Pearg] [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [hrpc] [Pearg] [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Vittorio Bertola
• REMINDER: Please take the IETF Community Survey for 2022
  • From: IETF Executive Director
• Re: [Pearg] [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: [saag] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Alec Muffett
• Re: [saag] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Tony Rutkowski
• Re: [saag] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Alec Muffett
• Re: [Pearg] [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Vittorio Bertola
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-12
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-10
  • From: tirumal reddy
• Re: train travel to IETF117
  • From: Dick Franks
• train travel to IETF117
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Jan 8 06:00:01 2023
  • From: John Levine
• times square 15 sec delay new years
  • From: Dave Taht
• Re: [saag] [hrpc] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Tony Rutkowski
• Re: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Dino Farinacci
• Re: It's never too early to share your levity!
  • From: Ross Finlayson
• Re: [hrpc] [Pearg] [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Adrian Gropper
• It's never too early to share your levity!
  • From: Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)
• Re: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Kyle Rose
• Re: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-10
  • From: Ben Schwartz
• Re: [hrpc] [saag] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Laurence Lundblade
• Re: [Pearg] [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Brad Chen
• Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation-25
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation-25
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation-25
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation-25
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox-20
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• Re: [hrpc] [saag] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: [hrpc] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-10
  • From: tirumal reddy
• Re: [Pearg] [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: [hrpc] [saag] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Laurence Lundblade
• Re: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Dino Farinacci
• [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-14
  • From: Spencer Dawkins via Datatracker
• Re: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [hrpc] [saag] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: bzs
• Re: [Pearg] [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
• Re: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Dino Farinacci
• Re: [hrpc] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [saag] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Tony Rutkowski
• Re: [Pearg] [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Dave Taht
• Re: [saag] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Alan DeKok
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-billon-expires-08
  • From: Tim Chown via Datatracker
• Re: [EXT] Re: [Pearg] [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Vittorio Bertola
• Re: [saag] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [saag] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Tony Rutkowski
• Re: [saag] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Alan DeKok
• [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation-25
  • From: Tim Chown via Datatracker
• Re: [Pearg] [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Tony Rutkowski
• RE: [Pearg] [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Antoine FRESSANCOURT
• Re: [Pearg] [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Brad Chen
• Re: [Pearg] [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: [saag] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Kyle Rose
• Re: [Pearg] [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Brad Chen
• Re: [saag] [Pearg] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Tony Rutkowski
• Re: [Pearg] [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: John Mattsson
• Re: [Pearg] [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Pearg] [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Vittorio Bertola
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox-20
  • From: Elwyn Davies via Datatracker
• Re: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Tony Rutkowski
• Re: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Dino Farinacci
• Re: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Dino Farinacci
• Re: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Dino Farinacci
• Re: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: [hrpc] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-12
  • From: Linda Dunbar
• Re: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Dave Taht
• Re: Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Vittorio Bertola
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-12
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: [hrpc] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Niels ten Oever
• Re: Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: George Michaelson
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-stir-messaging-06
  • From: tom petch
• Re: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox-18
  • From: Wubo (lana)
• RE: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Antoine FRESSANCOURT
• Re: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-jmap-blob-17
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-stir-messaging-06
  • From: Nancy Cam-Winget via Datatracker
• Re: [hrpc] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Adrian Gropper
• Re: Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Dave Taht
• Re: [saag] Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Dino Farinacci
• Re: Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Christian Huitema
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-12
  • From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
• Re: Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Last-Call] [DNSOP] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-08
  • From: Blacka, David
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-deployment-02
  • From: Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-deployment-02
  • From: Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
• [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-indicators-of-compromise-03
  • From: Rich Salz via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [DNSOP] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-08
  • From: Peter Thomassen
• Re: [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-deployment-02
  • From: Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
• Re: Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: Lloyd W
• Ten years after Snowden (2013 - 2023), is IETF keeping its promises?
  • From: John Mattsson
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: congress
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: universal service, was Outsourcing
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox-18
  • From: Sergio Aguilar Romero
• Re: universal service, was Outsourcing
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: universal friction, was Outsourcing
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: universal friction, was Outsourcing
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: universal service, was Outsourcing
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: universal friction, was Outsourcing
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: universal friction, was Outsourcing
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: universal service, was Outsourcing
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: universal service, was Outsourcing
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: universal service, was Outsourcing
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Outsourcing
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: universal service, was Outsourcing
  • From: John R Levine
• Everything
  • From: Dave Taht
• Outsourcing
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: the value of free, IETF e-mail junked
  • From: tom petch
• [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-mls-architecture-10
  • From: Valery Smyslov via Datatracker
• Re: the value of free, IETF e-mail junked
  • From: tom petch
• Re: the value of free, IETF e-mail junked
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: [Last-Call] [Idr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bfd-subcode-04
  • From: Jeffrey Haas
• Re: [Last-Call] [Idr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bfd-subcode-04
  • From: Jeffrey Haas
• [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-23
  • From: Mike McBride via Datatracker
• Re: the value of free, IETF e-mail junked
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• [Last-Call] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-08
  • From: David Blacka via Datatracker
• Re: the value of free, IETF e-mail junked
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox-18
  • From: Wubo (lana)
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox-18
  • From: Sergio Aguilar Romero
• Re: the value of free, IETF e-mail junked
  • From: Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
• Re: the value of free, IETF e-mail junked
  • From: John Levine
• Re: IETF e-mail junked
  • From: Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
• Re: [Last-Call] review of draft-billon-expires-08
  • From: Keith Moore
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-14
  • From: Yoav Nir via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] review of draft-billon-expires-08
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Last-Call] review of draft-billon-expires-08
  • From: John C Klensin
• Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Dec 25 06:00:01 2022
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [Last-Call] review of draft-billon-expires-08
  • From: George Michaelson
• Re: [Last-Call] review of draft-billon-expires-08
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Last-Call] [art] Artart last call review of draft-billon-expires-07
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Last-Call] review of draft-billon-expires-08
  • From: John C Klensin
• [Last-Call] review of draft-billon-expires-08
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-billon-expires-08
  • From: Keith Moore
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-billon-expires-08
  • From: Chris Lonvick via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox-18
  • From: Bo Wu via Datatracker
• Re: spam is still bad, was IETF e-mail junked
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [Congress] New Non-WG Mailing List: congress
  • From: Bob Briscoe
• Re: [Congress] New Non-WG Mailing List: congress
  • From: Christian Huitema
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-indicators-of-compromise-03
  • From: Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lake-edhoc-18
  • From: Michael Scharf via Datatracker
• Re: spam is still bad, was IETF e-mail junked
  • From: tom petch
• Re: spam is still bad, was IETF e-mail junked
  • From: Alessandro Vesely
• Re: [Congress] New Non-WG Mailing List: congress
  • From: Colin Perkins
• Re: spam is still bad, was IETF e-mail junked
  • From: tom petch
• Re: [Congress] New Non-WG Mailing List: congress
  • From: tom petch
• Re: spam is still bad, was IETF e-mail junked
  • From: tom petch
• Re: spam is still bad, was IETF e-mail junked
  • From: Alessandro Vesely
• Re: [Congress] New Non-WG Mailing List: congress
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [Congress] New Non-WG Mailing List: congress
  • From: Dave Taht
• Re: [Congress] New Non-WG Mailing List: congress
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: [Congress] New Non-WG Mailing List: congress
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Congress] New Non-WG Mailing List: congress
  • From: Martin Duke
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: congress
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: spam is still bad, was IETF e-mail junked
  • From: John Levine
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: congress
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-scip-04
  • From: Dan.Hanson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-davies-int-historic-03
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types-04
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-08
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: IETF e-mail junked
  • From: Alessandro Vesely
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-scip-04
  • From: Olivier Bonaventure
• Re: IETF e-mail junked
  • From: Martin J. Dürst
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: congress
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: IETF e-mail junked
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types-05
  • From: Nir Sopher
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-scip-04
  • From: Dan.Hanson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: IETF e-mail junked
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: IETF e-mail junked
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: IETF e-mail junked
  • From: John R. Levine
• Re: IETF e-mail junked
  • From: tom petch
• Re: IETF e-mail junked
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: IETF e-mail junked
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IETF e-mail junked
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: IETF e-mail junked
  • From: Hesham ElBakoury
• Re: IETF e-mail junked
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: [Last-Call] [lp-wan] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox-17
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• Re: [Last-Call] [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types-05
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• IETF e-mail junked
  • From: tom petch
• Re: [Last-Call] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox-17
  • From: Sergio Aguilar Romero
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lake-edhoc-18
  • From: Christer Holmberg via Datatracker
• Re: Problem Avoidance
  • From: Anupam Agrawal
• Re: [Last-Call] [tcpm] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-14
  • From: Vidhi Goel
• [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12
  • From: Christian Huitema via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox-17
  • From: Colin Perkins via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-14
  • From: Bo Wu via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-14
  • From: Ines Robles via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox-17
  • From: Jean-Michel Combes via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-scip-04
  • From: Olivier Bonaventure via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [spring] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment-10
  • From: Ines Robles
• Please take the IETF Community Survey 2022
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: [Last-Call] [lp-wan] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot-15.txt
  • From: Ivo Sedlacek
• [Last-Call] 答复: [CCAMP] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-ccamp-l1csm-yang-19
  • From: Zhenghaomian
• Re: [Last-Call] [pim] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-proxy-yang-08
  • From: Hongji Zhao
• [Last-Call] Dnsdir last call review of draft-davies-int-historic-05
  • From: Geoff Huston via Datatracker
• Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Dec 18 06:00:01 2022
  • From: John Levine
• [Last-Call] Dnsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation-25
  • From: Geoff Huston via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John R. Levine
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: [Last-Call] [CCAMP] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-ccamp-l1csm-yang-19
  • From: tom petch
• [Last-Call] 答复: [CCAMP] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-ccamp-l1csm-yang-19
  • From: Zhenghaomian
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-billon-expires-08
  • From: Keith Moore
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-billon-expires-08
  • From: Robert Sparks via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [CCAMP] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-ccamp-l1csm-yang-19
  • From: tom petch
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp-06
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp-06
  • From: Martin Thomson
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp-06
  • From: Peter Yee via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [pim] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-proxy-yang-08
  • From: Hitoshi Asaeda
• Re: [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox-16
  • From: Sergio Aguilar Romero
• Re: [Last-Call] [CDNi] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types-05
  • From: Daniel Migault
• Re: [Last-Call] [DMM] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-23.txt> (Segment Routing IPv6 for Mobile User Plane) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Behcet Sarikaya
• Re: Problem Avoidance
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp-05
  • From: Kyle Rose
• [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis-14
  • From: Gyan Mishra via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types-05
  • From: Brian Haberman via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Fwd: [lp-wan] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot-15.txt
  • From: Ana Minaburo
• Re: [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-proxy-yang-08
  • From: Hongji Zhao
• Re: [Last-Call] [ippm] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state-10 (really, this time)
  • From: xiao.min2
• Re : Problem Avoidance
  • From: Samir Srivastava
• Problem Avoidance
  • From: Samir Srivastava
• Re: [Last-Call] [ippm] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state-10 (really, this time)
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Problem Avoidance !! Was Re: [Rfc6761bis] New Non-WG Mailing List: rfc6761bis
  • From: Samir Srivastava
• Re: [Last-Call] [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis-14
  • From: Erik Kline
• Re: [Last-Call] [DMM] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-23.txt> (Segment Routing IPv6 for Mobile User Plane) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Erik Kline
• Re: [Last-Call] [standcore.com-standards] Re: [art] Artart last call review of draft-billon-expires-07
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: [Last-Call] [DMM] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-23.txt> (Segment Routing IPv6 for Mobile User Plane) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Joel Halpern
• [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis-14
  • From: Brian Haberman via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [standcore.com-standards] Re: [art] Artart last call review of draft-billon-expires-07
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Last-Call] [ippm] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state-10 (really, this time)
  • From: xiao.min2
• [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-jmap-blob-17
  • From: Jaime Jimenez via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [standcore.com-standards] Re: [art] Artart last call review of draft-billon-expires-07
  • From: tom petch
• Re: [Last-Call] [standcore.com-standards] Re: [art] Artart last call review of draft-billon-expires-07
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Last-Call] [standcore.com-standards] Re: [art] Artart last call review of draft-billon-expires-07
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: [Last-Call] [standcore.com-standards] Re: [art] Artart last call review of draft-billon-expires-07
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Last-Call] [standcore.com-standards] Re: [art] Artart last call review of draft-billon-expires-07
  • From: John R. Levine
• Re: [Rfc6761bis] New Non-WG Mailing List: rfc6761bis
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Last-Call] [CDNi] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types-05
  • From: Nir Sopher
• Re: [Rfc6761bis] New Non-WG Mailing List: rfc6761bis
  • From: Joe Abley
• [Last-Call] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state-10 (really, this time)
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: [Rfc6761bis] New Non-WG Mailing List: rfc6761bis
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: [Last-Call] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state-10
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• [Last-Call] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state-10
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: [Last-Call] [ietf-822] Expires header field * draft-billon-expires)
  • From: John C Klensin
• [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox-16
  • From: Behcet Sarikaya via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Fwd: [lp-wan] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot-14.txt
  • From: Ana Minaburo
• Re: [Rfc6761bis] New Non-WG Mailing List: rfc6761bis
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-09.txt> (Security Considerations for Transient Numeric Identifiers Employed in Network Protocols) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Ivan Arce
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-09.txt> (Security Considerations for Transient Numeric Identifiers Employed in Network Protocols) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [Last-Call] [art] Artart last call review of draft-billon-expires-07
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Last-Call] [standcore.com-standards] Artart last call review of draft-billon-expires-07
  • From: Kjetil Torgrim Homme
• Re: [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-12
  • From: Alvaro Retana
• Re: [Rfc6761bis] New Non-WG Mailing List: rfc6761bis
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-08
  • From: Antoni Przygienda
• Re: [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-08
  • From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
• Re: [Last-Call] [art] Artart last call review of draft-billon-expires-07
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Last-Call] [art] Artart last call review of draft-billon-expires-07
  • From: John R. Levine
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: rfc6761bis
  • From: Ralph Droms
• [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-proxy-yang-08
  • From: Susan Hares via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-billon-expires-07
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-10
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-billon-expires-07
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-rar-15
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-07
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-jmap-quotas-06
  • From: Thomas Fossati
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-09
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-jmap-blob-17
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-jmap-quotas-06
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-partial-02
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] [art] Artart last call review of draft-billon-expires-07
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-09.txt> (YANG Modules for Service Assurance) to Proposed Standard
  • From: tom petch
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-12
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-11 [RESEND]
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-deployment-02
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-pti-pen-registration-09
  • From: Lars Eggert
• [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10
  • From: Bo Wu via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-ccamp-l1csm-yang-19
  • From: Nicolai Leymann via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp-05
  • From: Wubo (lana)
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp-05
  • From: Martin Thomson
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp-05
  • From: Bo Wu via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-10
  • From: tirumal reddy
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp-05
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: [Last-Call] [standcore.com-standards] Artart last call review of draft-billon-expires-07
  • From: John R. Levine
• Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-billon-expires-07
  • From: tom petch
• Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-billon-expires-07
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-billon-expires-07
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-billon-expires-07
  • From: John C Klensin
• [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-deployment-02
  • From: Juan-Carlos Zúñiga via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-billon-expires-07
  • From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker
• Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Dec 11 06:00:01 2022
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [Last-Call] [bess] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-08
  • From: Parag Jain (paragj)
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-08
  • From: Parag Jain (paragj)
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-08
  • From: Parag Jain (paragj)
• Re: [Last-Call] [DNSOP] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-08
  • From: Meadows, Catherine CIV USN NRL (5543) Washington DC (USA)
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types-05
  • From: Daniel Migault via Datatracker
• Re: [Internet Policy] Our Internet, Our Future: Together We Can Protect the Internet for Today and Tomorrow
  • From: willi uebelherr
• Re: [Internet Policy] Our Internet, Our Future: Together We Can Protect the Internet for Today and Tomorrow
  • From: willi uebelherr
• [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-10
  • From: Xufeng Liu via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [DNSOP] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-08
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: [Last-Call] [DNSOP] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-08
  • From: Paul Vixie
• Re: [Last-Call] [DNSOP] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-08
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox-15.txt> (SCHC over Sigfox LPWAN) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Sergio Aguilar Romero
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-08
  • From: Catherine Meadows via Datatracker
• Re: [Internet Policy] Our Internet, Our Future: Together We Can Protect the Internet for Today and Tomorrow
  • From: Jorge Amodio
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp-05
  • From: Kyle Rose
• Re: [Internet Policy] Our Internet, Our Future: Together We Can Protect the Internet for Today and Tomorrow
  • From: vinton cerf
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-07.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: tom petch
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp-05
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: [Last-Call] [netconf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-13.txt> (An HTTPS-based Transport for YANG Notifications) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types-04
  • From: Dhruv Dhody
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp-05
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-07.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: George Michaelson
• Re: Our Internet, Our Future: Together We Can Protect the Internet for Today and Tomorrow
  • From: willi uebelherr
• [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-07.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John R Levine
• [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp-05
  • From: Kyle Rose via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [netconf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-13.txt> (An HTTPS-based Transport for YANG Notifications) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mahesh Jethanandani
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types-04
  • From: Nir Sopher
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: rfc6761bis
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: rfc6761bis
  • From: John C Klensin
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp-05
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: tom petch
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types-04
  • From: Nir Sopher
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: rfc6761bis
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: rfc6761bis
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: rfc6761bis
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types-04
  • From: Nir Sopher
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: rfc6761bis
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [Last-Call] [Manycouches] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-shmoo-online-meeting-04
  • From: Mirja Kuehlewind
• [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-12
  • From: Timothy Winters via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-ipv6-options-08
  • From: Lars Eggert
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-scip-04
  • From: Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-long-lived-gr-02
  • From: Wubo (lana)
• Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] SECDIR Review of draft-ietf-extra-sieve-action-registry-04
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: [Last-Call] [spring] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment-10
  • From: Rishabh Parekh
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-shmoo-online-meeting-04
  • From: Dale Worley via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types-04
  • From: Nir Sopher
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [Last-Call] [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-long-lived-gr-02
  • From: John Scudder
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-long-lived-gr-02
  • From: John Scudder
• Re: [Last-Call] Review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot-13
  • From: Ivo Sedlacek
• [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types-04
  • From: Valery Smyslov via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: George Michaelson
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-shmoo-online-meeting-04
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-billon-expires-06
  • From: Chris Lonvick via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Alessandro Vesely
• Re: [Last-Call] Review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot-13
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• [Last-Call] Review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot-13
  • From: Ivo Sedlacek
• Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] SECDIR Review of draft-ietf-extra-sieve-action-registry-04
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-shmoo-online-meeting-04
  • From: Mirja Kuehlewind
• Re: [Last-Call] [Extra] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-partial-02
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-shmoo-online-meeting-04
  • From: Mark Nottingham via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: [Last-Call] Last call feedback on draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp-05
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ohai] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp-05
  • From: Martin Thomson
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-shmoo-online-meeting-04
  • From: David Mandelberg via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types-04
  • From: Menachem Dodge via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types-04
  • From: Dhruv Dhody via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-08
  • From: Russ Housley via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-22
  • From: Gyan Mishra via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [OAUTH-WG] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-rar-15
  • From: Brian Campbell
• Re: [Last-Call] [OAUTH-WG] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-rar-15
  • From: Justin Richer
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Keith Moore
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-billon-expires-06
  • From: Carlos Pignataro via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Last call feedback on draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp-05
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-rar-15
  • From: Brian Campbell
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types-04
  • From: David Schinazi via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-long-lived-gr-02
  • From: Bo Wu via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-09
  • From: Wubo (lana)
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke-10
  • From: Sean Turner
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke-10
  • From: Sean Turner
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-rar-15
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-rar-15
  • From: Brian Campbell
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-rar-15
  • From: Robert Sparks
• [Last-Call] Dnsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis-13
  • From: Jim Reid via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-rar-15
  • From: Brian Campbell
• Schedule update
  • From: NomCom Chair 2022
• Re: [Last-Call] Gen-art last call review of draft-moskowitz-ipsecme-ipseckey-eddsa-06
  • From: Behcet Sarikaya
• [Last-Call] Dnsdir last call review of draft-moskowitz-ipsecme-ipseckey-eddsa-06
  • From: Johan Stenstam via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [standcore.com-standards] Re: Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis-08
  • From: Sheng Jiang via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke-10
  • From: Valery Smyslov
• Re: [Last-Call] [standcore.com-standards] Re: Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Keith Moore
• [Last-Call] Last call feedback on draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp-05
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-long-lived-gr-02
  • From: Mike McBride via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [standcore.com-standards] Re: Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke-10
  • From: Sean Turner
• Re: [Last-Call] [standcore.com-standards] Re: Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-subdomains-04
  • From: Reese Enghardt
• Re: [Last-Call] [standcore.com-standards] Re: Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John R. Levine
• Re: [Last-Call] [standcore.com-standards] Re: Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John R. Levine
• [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp-05
  • From: Sean Turner via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-raw-use-cases-08
  • From: CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Last-Call] Gen-art last call review of draft-moskowitz-ipsecme-ipseckey-eddsa-06
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Re: [Last-Call] Gen-art last call review of draft-moskowitz-ipsecme-ipseckey-eddsa-06
  • From: Behcet Sarikaya
• [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-billon-expires-06
  • From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker