Hi, On Jan 26, 2023, at 10:14, Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > However, a clarification is missing in this document even if it may seem obvious to you: > > « This document reflects the consensus obtained after active discussions in the ELEGY group. > Several ideas have been dismissed during discussions, and this document does not try to record them. » > > Then I can more easily « accept » the outcome, because I trust you all and understand that reaching consensus is a complex process that requires compromise. as the responsible AD here, I'd like to push back a bit on that addition, on the grounds that by default, all IETF standards-track documents only capture WG consensus without always explicitly saying so. (When they - rarely - describe paths not taken, *that* is then explicitly called out.) Thanks, Lars -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
