Re: [Last-Call] [httpapi] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis-04

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



hello mark.

On 2023-02-15 05:08, Mark Nottingham wrote:
I like the suggestion below; anyone else have an issue with incorporating it?

  If an extension member (see Section 3.2) occurs in the Problem field,
  its name MUST be compatible with the syntax of Dictionary keys (see
  Section 3.2 of [STRUCTURED-FIELDS]) and the defining problem type
  MUST specify a Structured Type to serialize the value into.

looks good to me. but what about replacing "Structured Type" (which is a term that's never used in that spec) with "Structured Data Type (see Section 3 of [STRUCTURED-FIELDS])"?

thanks and cheers,

dret.

--
Erik Wilde | mailto:erik.wilde@xxxxxxxx    |
           | https://youtube.com/ErikWilde |

--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux