Hi Christer,
Thanks very much for your genart review. We have tried to address your comments in PR #390.
https://github.com/lake-wg/edhoc/pull/390
Inline response below. Further comments are welcome.
Thanks,
Göran
From: Christer Holmberg via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, 20 December 2022 at 20:48
To: gen-art@xxxxxxxx <gen-art@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: draft-ietf-lake-edhoc.all@xxxxxxxx <draft-ietf-lake-edhoc.all@xxxxxxxx>, lake@xxxxxxxx <lake@xxxxxxxx>, last-call@xxxxxxxx <last-call@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lake-edhoc-18
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-lake-edhoc-18
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review Date: 2022-12-20
IETF LC End Date: None
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
Summary: The document is well written, and easy to read. I do have one minor
issue that I would like the authors to address.
Major issues: N/A
Minor issues:
Q1: The document talks about the Initiator and Responder roles, what messages
they send etc. But I can't find a definition of what the roles. I assume the
Initiator initiates something, but unless I have missed it it would be good to
have a few word of role definitions.
The Initiator is basically defined by the party sending message_1 and then the messages alternate between Initator and Responder. We added some more text to clarify
this.
Göran
Nits/editorial comments: N/A
|
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
