Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lake-edhoc-18

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christer, thank you for your review. I have entered a Discuss ballot for this document based on my own review.

Lars


> On Dec 20, 2022, at 21:47, Christer Holmberg via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
> Review result: Almost Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-lake-edhoc-18
> Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
> Review Date: 2022-12-20
> IETF LC End Date: None
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary: The document is well written, and easy to read. I do have one minor
> issue that I would like the authors to address.
> 
> Major issues: N/A
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> Q1: The document talks about the Initiator and Responder roles, what messages
> they send etc. But I can't find a definition of what the roles. I assume the
> Initiator initiates something, but unless I have missed it it would be good to
> have a few word of role definitions.
> 
> Nits/editorial comments: N/A
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux