[Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Reviewer: Reese Enghardt
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
Reviewer: Reese Enghardt
Review Date: 2023-01-16
IETF LC End Date: 2023-01-23
IESG Telechat date: 2023-02-02

Summary: This document is clear and concise. It is almost ready for
publication, just one minor issue.

Major issues: None.

Minor issues:

In Section 5.1:

"Some organizations might not
   be deterred in either case, while others might now find such an
   attack to not be feasible."
As the cost of the attack decreases, should the "not" be removed in the second
part here, so it'll read "others might now find such an attach to be feasible"?

Nits/editorial comments: None.



-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux