> On Jan 29, 2023, at 4:44 PM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal) <natal=40cisco.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Mike, > Thanks again for your review! We’re applying your suggestions, but we have one quick question regarding one of them, please see below. > Thanks, > Alberto > From: Mike McBride via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> > Date: Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 5:57 AM > To: rtg-dir@xxxxxxxx <rtg-dir@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub.all@xxxxxxxx <draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub.all@xxxxxxxx>, last-call@xxxxxxxx <last-call@xxxxxxxx>, lisp@xxxxxxxx <lisp@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10 > > Section 7.1: > > Change this: > Since Map-Notifies from the Map-Server to the ITR need to be... > To this: > Since Map-Notifies from the Map-Server to the ITR needs to be... > [AR] The former seems correct to me, would it be ok to leave it as is? I agree with Alberto. If you remove the two prepositional phrases, the subject is clearly plural and requires a plural verb. https://www.grammarbook.com/grammar/subjectVerbAgree.asp Thanks, Acee -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
