Stewart, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On Feb 1, 2023, at 12:34, Stewart Bryant via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Stewart Bryant > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-tcpm-hystartplusplus-13 > Reviewer: Stewart Bryant > Review Date: 2023-02-01 > IETF LC End Date: 2023-01-25 > IESG Telechat date: 2023-02-16 > > Summary: A well written document ready to do with just one small comment. > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: Remembering that this is the GENART review undertaken > as a non-specialist, I am not sure how well known the clamp function is. I had > to look it up, but once I did it was obvious. You might consider a few words to > define it for the reader. > > > > -- > last-call mailing list > last-call@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
