Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 3/21/2023 6:39 PM, Raghu Saxena wrote:
That's a pretty interesting note, and one which I think deserves a proper discussion. Considering how much more energy use is going towards the internet everyday, I do believe IETF plays a crucial role in increasing the efficiency (energy wise) of the internet.

For instance, by moving towards HTTP/3, if we reduce the RTT to establish a connection, that's less CPU time spent on establishing the connection, less electromagnetic radiation (fiber optics / wireless) required, since now x less packets need to be transmitted etc.

I do think using available funds for further advancing the goals of IETF directly would be a better use - you could argue that IETF is producing carbon offsets as a direct consequence of its work!

Efficiency increases are an obvious good thing but in the past, efficiency increases have been matched by increases in Internet usage, such as more videos or larger images, and I am not sure the total energy consumption decreased over time. If it did decrease, that means saving energy, but most of the energy saved comes in the form of electricity. Only a fraction of the electricity is produced by burning carbon based fuels, and that fraction is supposedly decreasing over time as cleaner techs replace burning coal, oil or gas.

We could argue that tools such as video conferences do directly save carbon emissions by reducing the need for physical travel. That's plausible, but very hard to measure because the Internet also enables making friends in remote places, which is a very good thing but ultimately encourages more traveling.

And then there is a counter argument that the Internet enables more international commerce, e.g., someone in America buying widgets from a producer in China through Amazon or Ali-Baba. These items have to be shipped across continents, so in a sense the Internet contributes to increased carbon emissions. I have no idea how all that balances, and I would indeed be delighted to read a good study. But that seems a job for ISOC, not the IETF.

As far as the IETF is concerned, the direct challenge ought to be whether we can be as efficient while traveling less, or at least by relying less on long distance air travel. We did run a two years experiment during Covid, and the results have been mixed: work kept progressing, but some measures like number of version-00 drafts did regress. We have to do better!

-- Christian Huitema




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux