Gyan, thank you for your review. I have entered a Discuss ballot for this document based on my own review. Lars > On Jan 7, 2021, at 07:27, Gyan Mishra via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Gyan Mishra > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-?? > Reviewer: Gyan Mishra > Review Date: 2021-01-06 > IETF LC End Date: 2021-01-04 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > This document updates RFC 3552 Security Considerations for Transient numeric > identifiers employed in network protocols. Currently RFC 3552 does not address > transient network identifiers exploitation by pervasive monitoring. > > Major issues: > None > > Minor issues: > My suggestion is to maybe have examples section similar to RFC 3552 that gives > examples of the security implications of the various types of transient numeric > identifiers. An example for IPv6 IID would be using modified EUI64 versus RFC > 4941 privacy extension or even RFC 7217 / RFC 8064 stable IID. > > Nits/editorial comments: > None > > > -- > last-call mailing list > last-call@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
