It appears that John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> said: >Glenn, > >It helps and thanks. As I tried to say in my note, >rationalizing things and making them consistent is clearly >reasonable and appropriate. But the key issue I raised, which >your explanation does not address, is the invocation of the Note >Well rather than either the underlying documents or a specific >Trust policy on the subject. When you submit an I-D, the submission page only has a link to the Note Well, and to BCP 78. Presumably that's adequate, because if it isn't, we have way worse problems than what's in the wiki. I am scratching my head trying to figure out why we can't assume that whoever puts notices on the wiki has enough sense to put something sufficient there. R's, John