Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-subdomains-04

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Reese, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document.

Lars


> On Nov 17, 2022, at 03:23, Reese Enghardt via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Reese Enghardt
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-acme-subdomains-04
> Reviewer: Reese Enghardt
> Review Date: 2022-11-16
> IETF LC End Date: 2022-11-21
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary: The document is well-written, clear, and to the point. I only found a
> few nits with opportunities for clarification.
> 
> Major issues: None.
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> Section 2:
> 
> " Fully-Qualified Domain Name (FQDN): This is often just a clear way
>          of saying the same thing as "domain name of a node", as outlined
>          above.  However, the term is ambiguous."
> 
> These two sentences appear to contradict each other - Is the term clear or
> ambiguous? I suggest removing the word "clear" to simply state how the term is
> commonly used, and then point out the ambiguity.
> 
> Section 3:
> 
> "6. server replies with an updated order object […]"
> 
> Is this updated order object similar to the "authorization" objects?
> When it says "authorizations" in step 2, are these also objects?
> I suggest defining the term "object", e.g., in Section 2, and then
> double-checking that this term is applied consistency in the document.
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> Section 4.3:
> 
> "If the client is unable to fulfill authorizations against parent domain"
> -> "If the client is unable to fulfill authorizations against a parent domain"
> 
> 
> 
> --
> last-call mailing list
> last-call@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux