> [Med] OK. Added a reminder of where to find dhcp-related security > issues with a specific RFC for reconfigured-specific issues > (RFC6977). RFC6977 is specific to reconfiguration with relay agents., and just provides generic discussions. What I expected in this draft in this context is how such discussions can apply to this specific usage of Section 5. I'm fine with deferring such a discussion to draft-ietf-add-dnr; I'm also fine with just removing any reference to Reconfigure from this draft (and maybe stating that's an out-of-scope topic). But the added reference to RFC6977 doesn't address my point. > [Med] Thanks. We went with a more elaborated version to better > explain the intent and call out the constraints: Thank you for the update. It looks good to me. -- jinmei -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
