Re: Clarification regarding URI (RFC3986) spec followed by HTTP (RFC9110)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Raghu Saxena <poiasdpoiasd@xxxxxxxx>, ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Clarification regarding URI (RFC3986) spec followed by HTTP (RFC9110)
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 09:31:39 -0600
In-reply-to: <MEYP282MB3564CAEFF922DFEEEE32813DA3CE9@MEYP282MB3564.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <MEYP282MB3564A385B6CECB0E9E92A630A3CE9@MEYP282MB3564.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <634ad97a-9081-1831-9c07-999a3c8e1bbf@gmx.de> <MEYP282MB3564CAEFF922DFEEEE32813DA3CE9@MEYP282MB3564.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1


On 1/25/23 4:54 AM, Raghu Saxena wrote:

(P.S. Sorry for the personal reply prior to this - my first time usingmailing lists)


Thank you for going through the extra trouble to use this list.

RjS

References:
- Clarification regarding URI (RFC3986) spec followed by HTTP (RFC9110)
  - From: Raghu Saxena
- Re: Clarification regarding URI (RFC3986) spec followed by HTTP (RFC9110)
  - From: Julian Reschke
- Re: Clarification regarding URI (RFC3986) spec followed by HTTP (RFC9110)
  - From: Raghu Saxena

Prev by Date: Re: [Last-Call] [Manycouches] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee-05
Next by Date: Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03
Previous by thread: Re: Clarification regarding URI (RFC3986) spec followed by HTTP (RFC9110)
Next by thread: Re: Clarification regarding URI (RFC3986) spec followed by HTTP (RFC9110)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux