Jay Daley <exec-director@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> <rsalz=40akamai.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Why would we make it public for a limited time?
>>
>> We? :) It was an overwhelming, not unanimous, decision of their year's
>> NomCom. If the community wants to keep it forever, and if the NomCom
>> approves doing that, we can discuss later. The tools team will have to
>> get involved, as right now the Wiki is slated for destruction as soon
>> as the new NomCom is seated. I am reluctant to keep it around forever,
>> for fear of ossifying things and because this year wasn't typical.
> Quick correction - it’s slated for deletion when the new NomCom
> *completes*, not beforehand. That way the current NomCom has the
> previous chair to consult and the previous chair has the wiki from
> their NomCom to consult.
That's way more sensible.
Good content could then migrate each time to the new nomcom site, and then
apply induction :-)
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
