Has IETF given up entirely on trying to be inclusive?
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject
: Has IETF given up entirely on trying to be inclusive?
From
: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 02:19:30 -0500
Feedback-id
: i5d8c41f0:Fastmail
In-reply-to
: <
167754040590.38006.14306415331328444890@ietfa.amsl.com
>
References
: <
167754040590.38006.14306415331328444890@ietfa.amsl.com
>
User-agent
: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.1
Did I miss it, or is there no fee waiver available for Yokohama?
Follow-Ups
:
Re: Has IETF given up entirely on trying to be inclusive?
From:
Dhruv Dhody
References
:
IETF 116 Reminders: Childcare, Standard Registration Deadline and General Information
From:
IETF Secretariat
Prev by Date:
Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-11
Next by Date:
Re: Has IETF given up entirely on trying to be inclusive?
Previous by thread:
IETF 116 Reminders: Childcare, Standard Registration Deadline and General Information
Next by thread:
Re: Has IETF given up entirely on trying to be inclusive?
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Annoucements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Mhonarc]
[Fedora Users]
