Re: Has IETF given up entirely on trying to be inclusive?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Has IETF given up entirely on trying to be inclusive?
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 13:07:10 +0530
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <8dd71cee-e0b9-22fc-3d6a-5edb5af3abf8@network-heretics.com>
References: <167754040590.38006.14306415331328444890@ietfa.amsl.com> <8dd71cee-e0b9-22fc-3d6a-5edb5af3abf8@network-heretics.com>

It is still there - https://www.ietf.org/forms/116-registration-fee-waiver/

On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 12:50 PM Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Did I miss it, or is there no fee waiver available for Yokohama?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Has IETF given up entirely on trying to be inclusive?
  - From: Keith Moore

References:
- IETF 116 Reminders: Childcare, Standard Registration Deadline and General Information
  - From: IETF Secretariat
- Has IETF given up entirely on trying to be inclusive?
  - From: Keith Moore

Prev by Date: Has IETF given up entirely on trying to be inclusive?
Next by Date: Re: Has IETF given up entirely on trying to be inclusive?
Previous by thread: Has IETF given up entirely on trying to be inclusive?
Next by thread: Re: Has IETF given up entirely on trying to be inclusive?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux