Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-26.txt> (I2NSF Consumer-Facing Interface YANG Data Model) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/03/2023 14:16, The IESG wrote:

The IESG has received a request from the Interface to Network Security
Functions WG (i2nsf) to consider the following document: - 'I2NSF
Consumer-Facing Interface YANG Data Model'
   <draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-26.txt> as Proposed Standard


This is one of a set of seven or so documents, one of which (framework) made RFC8329 six years ago, the others are waiting on MISSREF and then there is this one. It would be good to get these out as RFC.

A problem I have seen with them is ideas changing with them, evolving, so that the I-D are out of step. As this is the last, this might be the place to address this.

I have not had time, in the tsunami of I-D prior to IETF submission cut-off, to review this thoroughly but do see a divergence in the treatment of location. This used to be geo-ip, RFC8179, as is mentioned in RFC8329 and that is still referenced in e.g. nsf-facing. This I-D now uses country/region/city which is fine except for documents like 'capability' in the RFC-Editor Q which references RFC8179. The technically correct solution might be to update 'capability' etc but I think that the time for that is past. I put in some effort a few years ago to get them in line but no sooner had I done so than they diverged again after comments by other reviewers so I think that keeping them in line is a never ending task.

What this I-D perhaps could do is to mention this divergence in treatment. I will look some more to see where else they have diverged but not before the end of thie Last Call.

In passing, I note that the SIP example uses what might be genuine addresses.

Tom Petch

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
last-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2023-03-16. Exceptionally, comments may
be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


    This document describes an information model and the corresponding
    YANG data model for the Consumer-Facing Interface of the Security
    Controller in an Interface to Network Security Functions (I2NSF)
    system in a Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) environment.  The
    information model defines various types of managed objects and the
    relationship among them needed to build the flow policies from users'
    perspective.  This information model is based on the "Event-
    Condition-Action" (ECA) policy model defined by a capability
    information model for I2NSF, and the YANG data model is defined for
    enabling different users of a given I2NSF system to define, manage,
    and monitor flow policies within an administrative domain (e.g., user
    group).




The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm/


The following IPR Declarations may be related to this I-D:

    https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3554/
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3604/
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/5749/
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/5694/






_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
.


--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux