Re: Has IETF given up entirely on trying to be inclusive?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On 1 Mar 2023, at 07:39, Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On 3/1/23 02:37, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
>> It is still there - https://www.ietf.org/forms/116-registration-fee-waiver/
>> 
>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 12:50 PM Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Did I miss it, or is there no fee waiver available for Yokohama?
>> 
>> 
> Thanks.   (Though it seems like there should be some mention of it on the registration page.)

We currently stand at 154 fee waivers requested and 101 of those used from a current total of 303 remote registrations.  From those figures, it doesn’t appear as if we have an issue with people finding out about fee waivers.

The reason I’m saying this and not simply agreeing to add that text is because we already have so much text in so many places that it’s a problem and we need to move in the other direction of simplifying things not adding more.

Jay

> Keith
> 

-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
exec-director@xxxxxxxx





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux