On Feb 2, 2023, at 10:15 AM, Bob Halley via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > While I am not an EAP or TLS expert, I found the document to be very clearly > written, in particular in its explanations of why various choices were made. I > did not see anything worrisome in the document. Thanks. > The following are minor issues (typos, misspelling, minor text improvements) > with the document: > > 2.2: "when the j'th inner methods" seems like it would be better with "method". > 4: "and then perform resumption using another EAP type, just as EAP-TTLS (Type > 21)" should be "such as". Thanks. Fixed. -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
