Reviewer: Barry Leiba Review result: Ready Thanks for a clear, concise, and, if I may say, valuable document. I couldn't even find any typos. I have two very minor comments, both of which can be ignored if you prefer: 1. In Section 4, you use "somename.alt" -- was that chosen over "example.alt" for a particular reason? If so, carry on. If not, maybe consider switching? 2. I would promote RFC 8244 to a normative reference. I realize that one can make a reasonable argument both ways, so no big thing either way. -- Barry -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
